Demonstrate Understanding through Autoethnography
Exceeding | The writer demonstrates a rigorous and in-depth understanding of context, purpose and content knowledge in selecting an appropriately complex topic and thoroughly developing it through a beautifully written autoethnography. [5 grade points]
Meeting | The writer demonstrates a thoughtful understanding of context, purpose and content knowledge in selecting an appropriately complex topic and thoroughly developing it through a well written autoethnography. [3 grade points]
Approaching | The writer demonstrates an awareness of context, purpose and/or content knowledge in selecting a topic and attempting to develop it through a poorly written autoethnography. [1 grade point]and/or less than fully developed
Needing Improvement | The writer demonstrates minimal or no awareness of context, purpose and/or content knowledge in selecting a topic and/or the topic may be unsuitable, and/or the topic may lack development and the autoethnography is poorly written. [0 grade point]
Sources, Evidence and Style
Exceeding | The writer supports their autoethnography with compelling evidence appropriate to the writing task(s) drawn from high quality, credible, relevant sources which are documented consistently using an appropriate citation style. [5 grade points]
Meeting | The writer supports their autoethnography with evidence appropriate to the discipline and/or writing task(s) drawn from credible and relevant sources which are documented consistently using an appropriate citation style. [3 grade points]
Approaching | The writer attempts to support their autoethnography with evidence drawn from sources which are documented using a citation style. All important citation information is present. [1 grade point]
Needing Improvement | The writer fails to support their autoethnography with evidence from sources which are documented inconsistently, or some citation information is missing. [0 grade points]
Literacy Across the Curriculum 